Psychological Science and the Law
Hardcovere-bookprint + e-book
Psychological research can provide constructive explanations of key problems in the criminal justice system—and can help generate solutions. This state-of-the-art text dissects the psychological processes associated with fundamental legal questions: Is a suspect lying? Will an incarcerated individual be dangerous in the future? Is an eyewitness accurate? How can false memories be implanted? How do juries, experts, forensic examiners, and judges make decisions, and how can racial and other forms of bias be minimized? Chapters offer up-to-date reviews of relevant theory, experimental methods, and empirical findings. Specific recommendations are made for improving the quality of evidence and preserving the integrity of investigative and legal proceedings.
“We live at a time when psychological research in matters of social justice has never been so sorely needed. This text satisfies today's high demand for forensic psychology in the courts and in the college classroom. With up-to-date chapters written by active scholars, the book spans a range of sizzling topics—criminal profiling, lie detection, police interrogations and confessions, eyewitness memory, bias in the forensic sciences, judicial and jury decision making, plea bargaining, psychopathy, and what it means to be competent to stand trial.”
—Saul Kassin, PhD, Distinguished Professor of Psychology, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York
“If you have ever been curious about the deep connection between psychology and law, this is the book for you. Two eminent researchers have assembled a stellar group of scientists and scholars to fill readers in on the latest on eyewitness memory, judicial decision making, expert testimony, and a host of other topics. I felt immense pride when reading of the myriad ways psychology has contributed to solving some of the most vexing problems in our system of justice. You can see that for yourself, whether you’re learning about it for the first time or have been following the literature for years.”
—Elizabeth F. Loftus, PhD, Distinguished Professor of Social Ecology, and Professor of Law, and Cognitive Science, University of California, Irvine
“Brewer and Douglass have really hit the mark with this excellent, up-to-date work. A wide array of topics are covered, from traditional social and cognitive research related to eyewitness memory to more clinically based areas such as forensic interviewing and the assessment of competence. The book tackles emerging areas of research and practice that are not included in other texts, such as issues related to plea bargaining, cognitive bias in forensic decision making, and the pseudoscience of criminal profiling. Highly readable, this is an outstanding text for upper-level courses in psychology and law; it will also be useful for professionals in the criminal justice system.”
—Mitchell Eisen, PhD, Professor and Director, Forensic Psychology Graduate Program, California State University, Los Angeles
“Prominent scholars provide thorough summaries of the literature in each of the major domains of scholarship in psychology and law. Accessible, critical, and engaging, this text will be of great value to students, practitioners, and researchers—it fills a gap in the field.”
—Michael E. Lamb, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; Editor, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
“This beautifully crafted text provides a comprehensive, up-to-date discussion of contemporary debates and issues at the interface of psychology and criminal law. Readers learn how social, cognitive, clinical and forensic psychology inform a broad range of processes within criminal justice systems. Each chapter is written by one or more experts at the cutting edge of their respective fields who understand the benefits and challenges of translating science into practice. This is a worthy successor to Brewer and Williams's 2005
Psychology and Law, which has informed my teaching and research for over a decade. It will doubtless be regarded as the authoritative work on psychological science and the law for students, researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.”
—Kimberley A. Wade, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, United Kingdom
Table of Contents
Introduction: Psychology and the Criminal Justice System, Amy Bradfield Douglass & Neil Brewer
1. Criminal Profiling, Laura Fallon & Brent Snook
2. Cognitive Bias in Legal Decision Making, Steve Charman, Amy Bradfield Douglass, & Alexis Mook
3. Interrogations and Confessions, Stephanie Madon, Curt More, & Ryan Ditchfield
4. Deception Detection, Christopher A. Gunderson & Leanne ten Brinke
5. Eyewitness Memory, Sean M. Lane & Kate A. Houston
6. Interviewing Witnesses and Victims, Lorraine Hope & Fiona Gabbert
7. Child Witnesses, Thomas D. Lyon, Kelly McWilliams, & Shanna Williams
8. False Memory, Maria S. Zaragoza, Ira Hyman, & Quin M. Chrobak
9. Eyewitness Identification, James D. Sauer, Matthew A. Palmer, & Neil Brewer
10. Identifying People from Images, David White & Richard Kemp
11. Plea Bargaining, Miko M. Wilford, Annabelle Shestak, & Gary L. Wells
12. Competence to Stand Trial and Criminal Responsibility, Lauren E. Kois, Preeti Chauhan, & Janet I. Warren
13. Expert Testimony, Stephanie Marion, Jeffrey Kaplan, & Brian Cutler
14. Jury Decision Making, Liana C. Peter-Hagene, Jessica M. Salerno, & Hannah Phalen
15. Aggression, Violence, and Psychopathy, Devon L. L. Polaschek
16. Judicial Decision Making, Gregory Mitchell
17. Translating Psychological Science into Policy and Practice, Nancy K. Steblay
Index
About the Editors
Neil Brewer, PhD, is Matthew Flinders Distinguished Emeritus Professor of Psychology at Flinders University, South Australia. He is a Fellow of the Association for Psychological Science and of the Academy of Social Sciences in Australia. His research addresses eyewitness identification and recall, juror judgments, and, recently, interactions between individuals with autism spectrum disorder and the justice system. Dr. Brewer has served as the editor of the
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied and as an editorial board member for all the major psychology–law journals.
Amy Bradfield Douglass, PhD, is Professor of Psychology at Bates College. She teaches statistics and upper-level courses on psychology and law and psychology of religion. Her research focuses on how eyewitnesses make decisions, how eyewitness errors can be prevented, how social interactions with lineup administrators affect retrospective witness judgments, and how people perceive and evaluate eyewitnesses. Dr. Douglass is an editorial board member and former associate editor of
Law and Human Behavior.
Contributors
Neil Brewer, PhD, College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Steve Charman, PhD, Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, Florida
Preeti Chauhan, PhD, Department of Psychology, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, New York
Quin M. Chrobak, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin Oshkosh, Oshkosh, Wisconsin
Brian Cutler, PhD, Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Ryan Ditchfield, BSc, Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
Amy Bradfield Douglass, PhD, Department of Psychology, Bates College, Lewiston, Maine
Laura Fallon, MAPS, Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada
Fiona Gabbert, PhD, Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths University of London, London, United Kingdom
Christopher A. Gunderson, MA, Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado
Lorraine Hope, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Hampshire, United Kingdom
Kate A. Houston, PhD, Department of Social Sciences, Texas A&M International University, Laredo, Texas
Ira Hyman, PhD, Department of Psychology, Western Washington University, Bellingham, Washington
Jeffrey Kaplan, MSc, Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Richard I. Kemp, PhD, School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Lauren E. Kois, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Sean M. Lane, PhD, Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Thomas D. Lyon, PhD, Gould School of Law, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
Stephanie Madon, PhD, Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
Stephanie Marion, PhD, Faculty of Social Science and Humanities, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada
Kelly McWilliams, PhD, Department of Psychology, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, New York
Gregory Mitchell, PhD, JD, School of Law, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
Alexis Mook, BA, Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, Florida
Curt More, MS, Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
Matthew A. Palmer, PhD, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Liana C. Peter-Hagene, PhD, Department of Psychology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois
Hannah Phalen, BA, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Arizona State University, Glendale, Arizona
Devon L. L. Polaschek, PhD, School of Psychology, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand
Jessica M. Salerno, PhD, School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Arizona State University, Glendale, Arizona
James D. Sauer, PhD, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
Annabelle Shestak, MS, Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts
Brent Snook, PhD, Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada
Nancy K. Steblay, PhD, Department of Psychology, Augsburg University, Minneapolis, Minnesota
Leanne ten Brinke, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado
Janet I. Warren, DSW, Institute of Law, Psychiatry, and Public Policy, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
Gary L. Wells, PhD, Department of Psychology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa
David White, PhD, School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Miko M. Wilford, PhD, Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts
Shanna Williams, PhD, Gould School of Law, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
Maria S. Zaragoza, PhD, Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio
Audience
Students and professionals in forensic psychology and psychiatry, cognitive and social psychology, adult and child clinical psychology and psychiatry, social work, and child welfare; also of interest to attorneys, judges, law enforcement professionals, and others in the legal and criminal justice systems.
Course Use
Serves as a text in advanced undergraduate- and graduate-level courses such as Psychology and Law, Forensic Psychology, and Social Work and the Law.